Thank goodness that a segment of our board of commissioners recognize the cost to the taxpayers of expanded government. This "Design Review Board" would have (from this bloggers understanding of the discussions) created a redundant board for potential developers to go before. Keep in mind that these boards require overview/input from our township staff. Important to note that the APA Board has these same tasks assigned to them, or should if they are clearly defined. Good vote commissioners. Thank you for safeguarding our tax dollars and making our township more desirable to developers.

Bloggers note: this redundant board feels alot like the redundant website we are still paying for.

UM commissioners nix design commitee idea
By: Jesse Reilly, Staff Writer
10/07/2008

With downtown revitalization central to Willow Grove, the Upper Moreland Township Board of Commissioners voted against a new committee that the majority of the board feared would hinder a developer's interest in the area.

In a 4-3 vote, the establishment of a design and review board failed at the commissioner's Monday night meeting.

The review board, had it passed, would have been charged with ensuring developers were in compliance with township codes, review architectural and landscaping plans for development, promote increased harmony between the township and the developer, as well as encouraging new design for construction and renovations, the proposed ordinance said.

"The board is just another roadblock for developers," Commissioner James Hotchkiss said. "We are duplicating the Advisory Planning Association."Board President Stacey Efkowitz echoed Hotchkiss' sentiments. "It's just another layer of government, it's not necessary," she said. "The new board's recommendations would not even be enforceable."

Review board supporter, Commissioner Kevin Spearing added that much like the new board, the APA is not enforceable either."I am very much in favor of the board," he said. "A lot of developers in surrounding communities are in favor of the board because they are looking for guidance. The only problem developers had with it has been the scheduling of meetings.

"Member of the APA, Jonathan de Jonge agreed with the majority."Design approval is important, but it is something the APA is already charged with," he said. "Time is money and every time a developer has to appear in front of a board they are losing more money. It is more effective to have one-stop shopping."

Although potential developers would have to go through another committee, Commissioner Lisa Romaniello said it would be a benefit. "It [the board] will not, in any way shape or form, drive business away. It is a mistake to say it is an obstacle," she said. "It will provide a sense of town pride and give guideposts to interested developers."